By David Garrick
The San Diego Union-Tribune
SAN DIEGO — San Diego took one other step Friday towards ending the lengthy and dear authorized battle over 2012’s Proposition B, a voter-approved try to get rid of pensions for many new metropolis employees that was later overturned by the courts.
Town’s pension board voted Friday to require San Diego to pay $7.5 million to offer extra beneficiant pensions to roughly 1,000 cops employed since Proposition B.
| POLICE1 NEW RESOURCE: How to fund drone as first responder programs
That is the fourth personnel the town has needed to compensate since Proposition B’s reversal as a result of officers put the measure on the poll with out negotiating the small print with affected labor unions, as required below state legislation.
Friday’s settlement brings the town’s complete payout to unwind Proposition B to $203 million, with at the very least one more payout anticipated.
Whereas cops had been the one employees exempt from Proposition B’s elimination of pensions for brand spanking new hires, the poll measure made pensions for newly employed cops much less beneficiant than they had been earlier than the measure.
The measure diminished the utmost pension for a metropolis police officer from 90% of a retiree’s high wage to 80% of their high wage.
As well as, it required the highest wage to be calculated utilizing a median of the officer’s three most extremely paid consecutive years. Earlier than, the three years used within the calculation didn’t need to be consecutive.
Town’s pension system, the San Diego Metropolis Staff Retirement System, has calculated the price of giving affected officers the extra beneficiant pensions they’d have gotten earlier than Proposition B at $7.5 million.
That features $1 million to cowl the distinction between the pension contributions that affected officers have truly been making and the bigger pension contributions they need to have been making.
Town owes one other $900,000 to cowl the upper contributions the town ought to have been making on behalf of those officers. And the town owes one other $5.5 million to cowl what the pension system estimates extra beneficiant pensions for these officers will finally price.
The pension board voted 10-0 Friday to require the town to pay the $1.9 million in contribution prices up entrance in a single lump-sum fee on July 1, 2026, as a part of the town’s annual pension fee.
Town’s fee — which was a record $533 million for the brand new fiscal yr that started July 1 — is now slated to be $540.1 million throughout the fiscal yr that begins subsequent July.
Friday’s pension board vote additionally requires the town to slowly pay the $5.5 million in increased long-term pension prices over the subsequent 20 years. As an alternative of requiring up-front fee, the board is including the $5.5 million to the town’s $3.5 billion pension debt.
Pension system officers stated the brand new improve in debt received’t delay the town’s projected payoff date for that debt past the present 2044, however they stated funds can be barely increased earlier than then.
Town and pension board have adopted the identical procedures with three earlier teams of employees affected by Proposition B, requiring contribution prices up-front and permitting estimated increased pension prices to be amortized over 20 years.
Town paid $193.3 million in 2023 to create pensions for 2 teams of employees.
One group included greater than 3,000 employees employed after Proposition B took impact in July 2012 and who had been nonetheless working for the town when pensions had been restored in July 2021. They’re known as Section 2 employees.
The second group was 705 employees employed after the town agreed to revive pensions however earlier than officers had labored out precisely how that may occur and what it will price. They’re known as Section 1 employees.
Town additionally spent $2.2 million creating pensions for one more group known as Section 3 employees. That group included 204 individuals who had been employed after Proposition B took impact in July 2012 however had been not working for the town by the point pensions had been restored in July 2021 .
Friday’s settlement doesn’t conclude issues for the roughly 1,000 cops employed since Proposition B.
That very same group remains to be engaged in litigation towards the town over being denied pension credit score for six months they spent within the police academy.
The San Diego Police Officers Affiliation, a labor union that represents metropolis officers, says it will price the town about $11 million to unravel that dispute.
The dispute stems from a last-minute resolution by the authors of Proposition B to exempt cops from the measure.
However when that change was written into the Proposition B language, it utilized solely to “sworn” officers, which doesn’t embody police recruits who serve six months within the police academy earlier than changing into full-fledged “sworn” officers.
In its lawsuit, the police union argues that these officers ought to get pension credit score for these six months, which might increase the pensions they get after they retire.
Union president Jared Wilson stated Friday that he’s happy the town retains shifting towards unwinding Proposition B.
“Whereas we’re glad that a good portion of it has been resolved, we stay in litigation to make our members complete for the hurt precipitated whereas it was in impact,” Wilson stated.
He additionally known as the measure certainly one of “the most expensive blunders within the historical past of this metropolis” and blamed it for the town’s persevering with struggles to rent sufficient cops.
—
©2025 The San Diego Union-Tribune. Go to sandiegouniontribune.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.