The previous first minister advised the Mail on Sunday at an occasion in Glasgow that her views on the problem had been “well-known”.
The Glasgow MSP has been criticised in current weeks for her seeming refusal to talk on the problem, and never showing in Holyrood.
READ MORE: EHRC single-sex spaces guidance branded ‘authoritarian and cruel’
The Supreme Court dominated that beneath the Equality Act 2010, “girl” referred to organic intercourse, and never a transgender girl with a Gender Recognition Certificates (GRC).
Sturgeon was first minister when the Scottish Parliament handed its Gender Recognition Reform Act in 2022, which might permit transgender individuals to self-identify and simplified the necessities to accumulate a GRC, before it was blocked by Westminster from becoming law.
The Mail on Sunday confronted Sturgeon on her views at an SNP “espresso with Nicola” occasion in Govan final week.
Requested for her response to the ruling, Sturgeon mentioned: “I feel my views are well-known.”
Pushed on what these views had been, she replied: “I feel .”
(Picture: PA) The Supreme Court docket case was introduced towards the Scottish Government by For Girls Scotland (FWS), an anti-trans marketing campaign group who had been funded by Harry Potter writer JK Rowling and a crowdfunder.
Initially, FWS challenged the Scottish Authorities over the definition in relation to steerage on gender illustration on public boards. Quite a few hearings and appeals within the Court docket of Session led for the case to be thought-about by the Supreme Court docket.
Former SNP MP Joanna Cherry, who supported the FWS case and has been outspoken on her gender vital views, beforehand mentioned: “If Nicola Sturgeon believes the Supreme Court docket bought it mistaken, she ought to come out and say so and clarify why she thinks that. That silence, to my thoughts, is simply redolent of cowardice.”
It comes as Scottish Greens MSP Maggie Chapman faces a vote on her position as a member of Holyrood’s Equalities Committee, following criticism she manufactured from the Supreme Court docket’s resolution.