On January 7, an ICE officer in Minneapolis was involved in a fatal shooting after a feminine driver accelerated her car towards officers throughout an tried arrest. In accordance with public statements, the car struck an officer and continued ahead, crashing into parked automobiles. The incident stays beneath investigation.
Typically talking, I might not be discussing an officer-involved capturing hours after it occurred. Normally, too little data is accessible and an excessive amount of investigation stays earlier than significant assessments could be made.
Nevertheless, Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey already held a information convention dismissing any declare of self-defense on this case. On condition that public judgment, I felt compelled to share my perspective to offer stability primarily based on coaching and expertise — to not attain a authorized conclusion, however to elucidate how officers expertise vehicle-based threats.
| DOWNLOAD: 26 on 2026: A police leadership playbook
My distinctive perspective
As Police1 readers could know, I served as a police officer for 33 years and as a use-of-force teacher for greater than 40 years. I’ve written a textbook on techniques for lethal power encounters and have testified on behalf of officers as an knowledgeable witness prior to now.
My perspective additionally comes from a private expertise early in my profession that completely formed how I educate and take into consideration car assaults.
An evening on foot patrol
One evening whereas on foot patrol, I witnessed a car flip the flawed approach onto a one-way road and strike one other automobile head-on. As I approached the scene, the offending driver backed round a nook and stopped. It appeared neither driver was injured.
My companion checked on the driving force who had been hit whereas I approached the offending car, which seemed to be ready for contact.
As I crossed the intersection, the driving force’s eyes met mine — and one thing modified. In that on the spot, I knew he was going to drive at me. After that temporary look, he put the automobile in gear and intentionally drove towards me.
He hit me.
I didn’t shoot. Being a wrestler, I instinctively positioned my arms on the entrance of the automobile and shot my legs again, as if defending a takedown. The automobile drove by means of me. I rolled up and over the hood and off the passenger aspect. One other officer picked me up and we pursued the driving force of the car that hit me. After an extended pursuit, he turned hung up on a median and I used to be capable of get to him earlier than he continued his flight and peel him out of the car to arrest and handcuff him.
The aftermath
The affect put me in splints and a solid, and people accidents affected me completely. I might by no means once more run marathons or carry out a bounce spinning again kick.
And sure, that also annoys me. I beloved that kick.
Every time I really feel the residual ache to at the present time, I’m reminded that capturing that suspect would possible have been defensible — and might need spared me lasting damage.
At any charge, the expertise taught me one thing I now cross on to others: if a automobile hits you and doesn’t kill you, it doesn’t make you stronger.
Ideas within the second
It’s troublesome for folks to grasp what goes by means of a cop’s thoughts within the second between recognizing a car goes to hit you and the second of affect.
With that in thoughts, I’ll clarify how an officer in such a state of affairs could understand occasions, primarily based on coaching and expertise — not as a reconstruction of this incident, however as a standard sample seen in car assault encounters.
What an officer could understand throughout a car assault
- The officer could strategy from the entrance as a result of circumstances place him there, not as a result of it was a deliberate alternative.
- Different officers could also be trying verbal instructions on the driver’s window, hoping to realize compliance.
- A driver backing up creates uncertainty — officers fairly marvel what comes subsequent.
- When the driving force shifts into drive, one officer could try and open the door whereas others shout instructions to cease.
- For the officer in entrance of the car, the whole lot slows down because the automobile accelerates towards him, reworking from transportation right into a lethal weapon.
- In that on the spot, the officer could expertise fast, parallel ideas — survival, damage, household, and the potential for demise — all whereas attempting to behave.
- The officer could try to maneuver and draw concurrently, understanding hesitation could be deadly. Backing up earlier than accelerating can fairly seem as a deliberate setup to strike.
- Coaching kicks in because the officer acknowledges the upcoming risk of demise or nice bodily hurt.
- The officer can also acknowledge the hazard to fellow officers close to the car, significantly these reaching inside.
- As photographs are fired, the officer should still be struck by the car, counting on stability and motion to keep away from being pulled beneath.
All of this will happen in a fraction of a second. When it doesn’t — when an officer freezes — the outcome could be catastrophic.
Even when a driver is incapacitated, the car’s momentum could proceed.
My evaluation
Whether or not using power in Minneapolis is in the end dominated lawful is a matter for investigators and the courts, not the Mayor, not the Governor, and definitely not a mob within the streets.
What shouldn’t be ignored is the truth officers face when automobiles are used as weapons — a actuality that unfolds in fractions of a second and leaves no margin for hesitation.
Keep protected, keep sturdy, keep constructive and keep ready.
